hEDS, POTS & MCAS: Research Landscape Document – Funding, Affiliations & Study Design

This document maps the current research landscape for hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS), Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS), and their overlap — referred to as the Trifecta.

Each entry documents the study, its authors, methodology, sample size, key finding, funding source, and sample provenance where declared. This transparency allows patients, clinicians, researchers, caregivers, and funders to understand not only what the research shows, but who conducted it and under what conditions.

Understanding the funding and sample relationships between studies and advocacy organisations is standard research literacy. This document presents that information factually and without judgement, as a service to all audiences.

Research gap statements are included throughout. These are not criticisms — they identify where the evidence is thin, where studies have not yet been conducted, and where patient need is not yet matched by research investment. Gaps are opportunities, not failures.

This document is reviewed quarterly. New significant publications will be added at each review cycle.

This document is organised by condition first, then by research question. Navigate to the condition most relevant to you, then find the question you want answered.

Conditions covered: hEDS · POTS / Dysautonomia · MCAS · Trifecta Overlap · Long COVID / PASC · Neurodivergence · HαT · Dermatology

Research questions addressed for each condition:

  • What causes it? (Genetics, mechanism, biomarkers)
  • How common is it? (Prevalence, diagnostic delay)
  • How do we diagnose it? (Criteria, biomarkers, tools)
  • What treatments work? (Pharmacological, lifestyle)
  • Who else gets it? (Comorbidities, overlap)

Companion resources are listed at the end of this document and cover specialist areas in more depth: cardiac and structural assessment, folate and embryology, neurodivergence, and Long COVID.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Gensemer et al. / Norris Lab, MUSC2025WES, 200 hEDS patients, KLK15 knock-in mouse modelRare variants in 14/15 KLK genes. KLK15 variant segregates in multiple families. Mouse model recapitulates hEDS features including mitral valve prolapse. Reframes hEDS as matrix remodeling and immune signaling beyond collagen.MUSC IndependentMUSC Registry
Petrucci-Nelson et al. / Norris Lab MUSC2025GWAS meta-analysis, 1,815 cases, 5,008 controls. UK Biobank + All of Us + MUSC. 6.2 million variants.First large-scale GWAS of hEDS. Identified genetic associations across three independent cohorts. SLC39A13 identified as top candidate gene.MUSC IndependentMUSC Registry + UK Biobank + All of Us
HEDGE Study — Laukaitis & Hirschhorn2025Whole genome sequencing, ~1,000 cases, 86 countries. Broad Institute.No single causative gene found. Rare TNXB variants in small number. KLK15 described as not explaining most cases (preliminary findings — papers expected 2026).EDS Society funded and ledEDS Society recruited
Norris Lab / Sequencing.com collaborationOngoingWhole genome sequencing + clinical phenotype data, de-identifiedPotentially the largest genetic study of hEDS and dysautonomia to date. Active recruitment.MUSC / Sequencing.comSequencing.com / MUSC Registry

Research gap: The KLK-family genetic findings require independent replication in cohorts outside MUSC. The HEDGE preliminary finding that KLK15 does not explain most cases addresses population-level common variants — a different methodological question from the family-based rare variant approach of the Norris Lab. These are not contradictory studies; they ask different questions. Both require ongoing investigation.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Griggs et al. / Norris Lab, MUSC2025Mass spectrometry proteomics, 29+41 hEDS patients vs matched controls. ELISA validation.35 differentially expressed proteins. 43% involve complement cascade. Significant reductions in C1QA, C3, C8A, C8B, C9. Links KLK-complement pathway to MCAS via C3a/C5a anaphylatoxin generation.MUSC IndependentEDS Society provided samples (declared in paper methods; not declared in EDS Society social media promotion)
Ritelli et al. / University of Brescia2025Western blotting, fibronectin and collagen fragments, independent Italian cohortIdentified FN and COLLI fragment signature in hEDS/HSD plasma. Proposed first blood test for hEDS. NOTE: Norris Lab attempted replication using same samples and found bands present in all samples including controls — non-replication not yet published independently.University of Brescia IndependentIndependent Italian cohort
de Graf et al. / ICR — InVitro Cell Research2025Proteomics, 700+ participants: 324 hEDS, 33 HSD, 341 controlsDifferences in immune system activity, complement proteins, pain signaling, tissue repair. Largest blood-based proteomics study to date at time of publication.EDS Society funded active collaborationEDS Society funded and recruited

Research gap: The Norris Lab non-replication of Ritelli fibronectin findings is clinically significant and has not been formally published as a standalone replication study. Independent replication of biomarker findings across centres is essential before any biomarker is considered validated. The disconnect between the Ritelli finding and the Norris non-replication has not been communicated to the patient community.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Malfait et al.2017International classification consensusCurrent reference standard 2017 hEDS diagnostic criteria. Three-criterion framework: GJH, systemic features, exclusion of alternatives. Includes MVP and aortic root dilation as cardiovascular features.EDS Society / International ConsortiumExpert consensus
Ritelli et al. / University of Brescia2024Retrospective, 327 patients, 213 families, Italian reference centre2017 criteria criticised as too stringent. Advocates for broadening criteria. hEDS and HSD may represent spectrum of one condition.University of Brescia IndependentIndependent Italian cohort
Forghani et al. / University of Miami2025Retrospective, 907 patients referred for hEDS evaluation 2019-2022178/907 (19.6%) met 2017 criteria. Genetic testing identified alternative/additional diagnosis in 47 of those (26.4%). Highlights importance of genetic exclusion.University of Miami IndependentHCTD Clinic Registry
Toronto GoodHope EDS Clinic2020Retrospective cohort, 131 patients with prior hEDS diagnosisOnly 15% (20/131) of patients with prior hEDS diagnosis met 2017 criteria. Criteria may require refinement.Independent clinical reviewClinical cohort
Tofts et al.2023Narrative review / consensusPaediatric joint hypermobility diagnostic framework. Recommends against hEDS diagnosis before biological maturity.International ConsortiumExpert consensus

Research gap: The 2026 hEDS diagnostic criteria update (Road to 2026) is currently in development. Preliminary findings suggest criteria may incorporate KLK variants, dysautonomia, and MCAS as comorbidities — which would represent a significant paradigm shift. The new criteria are expected late 2026.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Daylor et al. / Norris Lab MUSC2025Global survey, 3,906 hEDS + 546 HSD participants, 9,258 responses screenedMean 24 comorbidities in hEDS. Average diagnostic delay 22.1 years. Symptom onset average age 9.3 years. Dermatological issues reported by 99.6% of hEDS participants.MUSC IndependentMUSC / International survey
Halverson et al.2023Survey, 505 hEDS patients, EDS Society Global RegistryAverage 10.45 alternative diagnoses before hEDS. Anxiety, depression, migraines, POTS, IBS most common co-diagnoses.EDS Society — used EDS Society registryEDS Society Global Registry
Petrucci et al. / MUSC2024Cluster analysis, MUSC cohortIdentified distinct phenotypic clusters and multimorbidity patterns in hEDS. Supports hEDS as heterogeneous condition.MUSC IndependentMUSC Registry
Wachs et al. / DICE Registry2024Survey, 2,500+ hEDS patients, DICE Global Registry60%+ self-reported POTS. High rates ADHD, heart conditions, GI issues. Self-report bias acknowledged — cannot infer population prevalence.Independent (patient-led registry)DICE Registry — self-report
Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Eichinger et al. / MUSC2025Clinical study, hEDS orthopaedic presentationsDocuments orthopaedic manifestations and management approaches in hEDS.MUSC IndependentMUSC clinical cohort
Baeza-Velasco et al.2023Prospective, 9-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation programSustained improvements at 6 months in 6-minute walk test, balance, fatigue, kinesiophobia, quality of life. Strongest evidence for multidisciplinary rehab in hEDS.IndependentClinical cohort
Aziz et al. / AGA2025AGA Clinical Practice UpdateClinical guidance for GI symptoms in hEDS with MCAS/POTS. Recommends targeted testing rather than universal screening. Expert review.American Gastroenterological AssociationExpert consensus / literature review

Research gap: No well-powered randomised controlled trial exists for any pharmacological treatment specifically in hEDS. Treatment recommendations are largely extrapolated from related conditions or based on expert opinion. This is the most significant evidence gap in hEDS clinical management.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Miller et al.2020Cross-sectional, 91 POTS patients at 2018 Dysautonomia International Conference31% of POTS patients met 2017 hEDS criteria. 55% had generalised joint hypermobility. First study using 2017 criteria.Dysautonomia International fundedConference convenience sample
Maxwell et al.2025Retrospective, 100 young POTS patients31% MCAS in POTS+hEDS vs 2% without. Strong trifecta prevalence signal across multiple diagnostic frameworks.IndependentClinical cohort
Peebles et al.2022HUT and active stand, 45 young women across hypermobility spectrumPOTS more prevalent in HSD than hEDS on HUT. Challenges inclusion of POTS in hEDS diagnostic criteria based on objective testing alone.IndependentClinical cohort
Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Kwok et al.2025Systematic review, 21 RCTs, 750 patients, 2000-2023No well-powered RCTs for any POTS treatment. Beta-blockers, midodrine, ivabradine most studied. Large multicenter trials urgently needed.IndependentLiterature review
Frontiers Neurology systematic review2025Systematic review, oral medications for POTSIvabradine and midodrine show highest symptomatic improvement rates. Beta-blockers show largest heart rate reduction.IndependentLiterature review
Clinical Autonomic Research systematic review2025Systematic review, 45 studies, pharmacological and non-pharmacologicalCompression garments, physical training, salt supplementation, vagal nerve stimulation as first-line non-pharmacological options.IndependentLiterature review
Canadian Cardiovascular Society2020Position statementClinical guidance on POTS management. Reference standard for Canadian practice.CCSExpert consensus
Lau et al. / University of Adelaide, ADARC2026State-of-the-art review. Heart, Lung and Circulation. Australian authorship (ADARC, University of Adelaide).Most recent and comprehensive clinical POTS review. Covers diagnosis, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment, multidisciplinary care, diagnostic delay, and specialist access gaps. Flags urgent need for services to meet the growing POTS population. Direct relevance to Australian clinical practice.Independent. Funded by Dysautonomia International and Standing Up to POTS.Literature review / expert synthesis

Research gap: No well-powered RCT exists for any single POTS treatment. Most trials are small, short-duration, and rely on heart rate outcomes rather than patient-reported quality of life. Treatment in hEDS-associated POTS specifically — where vascular and connective tissue mechanisms may differ — has not been separately studied.

Two competing diagnostic frameworks exist. This is not a settled question. The choice of framework has direct patient consequences — determining who receives a diagnosis and therefore who receives treatment.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Valent et al. / ECNM-AIM Consensus-12012International expert consensusStricter criteria. Requires objective mediator elevation (tryptase 20%+2 formula within 4 hours of episode). Endorsed by European and US allergy/immunology bodies. Higher specificity, may miss milder presentations.ECNM / AIM — independentExpert consensus
Afrin & Molderings / Consensus-22020Clinical diagnostic frameworkBroader clinical criteria. Emphasises symptom burden and treatment response. Captures more patients. Contested for potential overdiagnosis by Consensus-1 proponents. Best available clinical tool in absence of validated alternatives.IndependentClinical experience / literature
Gülen et al. / Karolinska2024Comprehensive criteria updateReviews challenges in diagnosing MCAS. Supports rigorous application of objective criteria.Karolinska University HospitalClinical review
Zaghmout et al.2024703 patients with suspected mast cell disordersLow confirmed prevalence of idiopathic MCAS when strict criteria applied. Important counterpoint to prevalence estimates from broader criteria.IndependentClinical cohort
ASCIA Position Paper2025Australian clinical guidanceAustralian diagnostic and management guidance for MCAS. Tryptase identified as most accessible validated test in Australia.ASCIA — Australian peak bodyExpert consensus

Research gap: No outcome validation study has compared Consensus-1 vs Consensus-2 diagnostic frameworks against patient outcomes, treatment response, or quality of life. The criteria debate remains theoretical rather than evidence-based. This is the most urgent diagnostic research need in the MCAS field.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Molderings, Afrin et al.2016Literature review, pharmacological treatment optionsNo therapeutic trials conducted in MCAS. Evidence from small case series only. Stepwise approach: H1/H2 antihistamines, mast cell stabilisers, leukotriene antagonists, targeted adjuncts.IndependentLiterature review
Afrin et al. / Am J Med Sci2017Systematic characterisation, 413 MCAS patients (298 retrospective + 115 prospective)First large MCAS cohort study. Median age at symptom onset 9 years. Median diagnostic delay 30 years. Documents treatment response patterns.University of Minnesota / MUSCClinical cohort
Molderings, Afrin et al. / J Hematol Oncol2011Foundational clinical guideOriginal practical guide for MCAS diagnostic workup and therapeutic options. Consensus-2 framework basis.IndependentClinical experience
Castells & Butterfield2019Clinical reviewMost widely cited treatment reference. Stepwise approach from antihistamines to mast cell stabilisers.IndependentLiterature review
Canadian Consensus Guidelines2025Practical management approach, CanadaStepwise diagnosis and management. Includes HαT in differential.Canadian allergy/immunology bodiesExpert consensus
Mast Cell Action UK Primary Care Guide2025Primary care clinical guidancePractical UK guidance. Explicitly notes limited evidence base for all current treatments.Mast Cell Action UK charityExpert consensus

Research gap: No randomised controlled trial of any treatment has been conducted in a properly diagnosed MCAS population. This is the single most significant evidence gap across the entire trifecta. Antihistamines — the first-line treatment — have never been tested in an RCT in MCAS despite being recommended with confidence across clinical guidelines.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Maxwell et al.2025Retrospective, 100 POTS patients, Frontiers Neurology31% MCAS in POTS+hEDS vs 2% without. Odds ratio 32.46. Statistically significant trifecta clustering.IndependentClinical cohort
Kohn & Chang2020Literature reviewFoundational review of relationship between hEDS, POTS and MCAS. Most cited trifecta review.IndependentLiterature review
Afrin et al. / Am J Med Genet2016Clinical case seriesMCAS prevalence in hEDS/HSD patients. Documents trifecta co-occurrence.IndependentClinical cohort

The KLK-complement-mast cell-autonomic pathway (Norris Lab, 2024-2025) provides the first mechanistically coherent biological explanation for the trifecta:

KLK variants → ECM remodeling + complement cleavage (C3/C5) → C3a/C5a anaphylatoxins → mast cell activation → MCAS → autonomic dysregulation via vascular tone → POTS

This pathway connects the Gensemer et al. iScience 2025 genetic findings directly to the Griggs et al. ImmunoHorizons 2025 complement proteomics findings — two independent Norris Lab papers that together describe a complete biological mechanism.

Research gap: The KLK-complement-autonomic pathway is an emerging mechanistic hypothesis based on two peer-reviewed papers and a preprint. It requires independent replication and formal testing in a prospective cohort before it can be considered an established mechanism. It is the most promising mechanistic framework currently available.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Davis et al.2023Major review, Nature Reviews MicrobiologyLong COVID affects at least 10% of SARS-CoV-2 infections. 65 million affected globally. POTS and ME/CFS overlap documented.IndependentLiterature review
Ganesh & Munipalli2024Frontiers NeurologyLong COVID and hypermobility spectrum disorders share pathophysiology. COVID as unmasking mechanism for underlying hEDS/HSD.IndependentLiterature review
Torok et al.2025Case-control, USA and UK, BMJ Public HealthVariant connective tissue as independent risk factor for Long COVID. 30% more likely to experience prolonged symptoms.IndependentPopulation study
Seeley et al.2025Prospective cohort, Am J Med — Australian POTS FoundationHigh incidence of autonomic dysfunction and POTS in Long COVID. Direct Australian relevance.Australian POTS Foundation collaborationClinical cohort
Sumantri & Rengganis2023Clinical review, Asia Pacific AllergyMCAS mechanism in Long COVID. Mast cell activation as driver of Long COVID inflammatory state.IndependentLiterature review
LISTEN Study cohort2024578 Long COVID participants, Yale28.9% reported new-onset POTS in Long COVID.NIH / YaleProspective cohort

Research gap: No prospective study has specifically examined the prevalence of undiagnosed hEDS/HSD in Long COVID populations, or the outcomes of MCAS-directed treatment in Long COVID patients with trifecta features. This represents an urgent and feasible research priority.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Cederlöf et al.2016Nationwide Swedish population cohortPeople with EDS 7.4x more likely to have ASD than controls. 5.6x more likely to have ADHD. Foundational epidemiological finding.Swedish national registry — independentNational population registry
Csecs, Iodice, Rae et al.2022Frontiers PsychiatryJoint hypermobility links neurodivergence to dysautonomia and pain. Proprioceptive and autonomic mechanism proposed.IndependentClinical cohort
Glans et al.2021Large cross-sectional case-controlGeneralised joint hypermobility and ASD in adults. Significant association confirmed.IndependentClinical cohort
Eccles et al.2024Philosophical Transactions Royal Society BProprioceptive surprise model linking hypermobility, neurodivergence, and emotional dysregulation. Key mechanistic paper.Independent — Dr Jessica EcclesClinical research
2025 review of 20 studies2025Systematic reviewApproximately 31% of autistic individuals have elevated hypermobility.IndependentLiterature review
Daylor et al.2025Survey, 3,906 hEDS patientsHigh rates of ADHD and ASD reported in hEDS survey population.MUSC IndependentMUSC / International survey

Research gap: ASD and ADHD diagnostic criteria were developed predominantly from male populations. Females systematically mask presentations, resulting in later diagnosis or no diagnosis. The true prevalence of neurodivergence in hEDS populations — which is predominantly female — is likely underestimated in every study to date. A study using female-specific assessment tools in a well-characterised hEDS population is urgently needed.

HαT is caused by increased copy number of the TPSAB1 gene encoding alpha-tryptase. Elevated baseline tryptase results. Affects approximately 5% of Western populations. Important modifier of mast cell-related presentations.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
Lyons et al. / NIH NIAID2019Nature Genetics, discovery paperHαT identified. TPSAB1 copy number gain drives elevated baseline tryptase. Associated with joint hypermobility, GI symptoms, dysautonomia.NIH / NIAIDNIH cohort
Vazquez et al.2021Genotyping, 266 patients: HSD, hEDS, axial skeletal hypermobilityHαT prevalence in hEDS not significantly higher than general population (4.9%). However HαT modifies phenotype when present — dysphagia and retained primary dentition significantly associated.IndependentClinical cohort
White et al. / NIH NIAID2024250 POTS patients, tryptase genotypingHαT prevalence in POTS not significantly higher than general population. Autonomic disorders more common in HαT but reverse not true.NIH / NIAIDClinical cohort
Farley et al. / Mayo Clinic2025Systematic review, POTS and EDS, MCAS and HαTSystematic review of MCAS, HαT prevalence in POTS and EDS populations.Mayo Clinic IndependentLiterature review

Research gap: The interaction between SERPINA1 (AAT) deficiency and TPSAB1 copy number gain has not been formally studied. When AAT — which normally inhibits tryptase — is deficient, elevated tryptase from HαT may act in an environment of impaired inhibition, potentially creating a functional MCAS-like state through a protease/antiprotease imbalance mechanism. This proposed SERPINA1/TPSAB1 functional axis warrants formal biochemical investigation (Finnegan, 2026 — novel hypothesis).

Dermatological manifestations are the most prevalent comorbidity domain in hEDS — reported by 99.6% of hEDS patients in the Daylor et al. 2025 global survey. This is the highest prevalence of any of the eight comorbidity domains studied, and yet dermatology research in hEDS is among the thinnest in the literature.

Study / AuthorsYearMethod / SampleKey FindingFunderSample Source
JAAD clinical review2023Systematic review, dermatologic manifestations of EDS subtypes, PubMed + Web of SciencePiezogenic papules, velvety skin, easy bruising, abnormal scarring documented in hEDS. Abnormal scarring present in ~77.7% of all EDS cases. Piezogenic papules show predominance in hEDS.Independent — American Academy of DermatologyLiterature review
Dermatological aspects of hEDS in women2021PMC review, female-specificSkin features in hEDS women. Relevance to female-predominant presentation and missed diagnosis.IndependentLiterature review
Daylor et al.2025Survey, 3,906 hEDS patientsDermatological issues reported by 99.6% hEDS and 93.2% HSD participants — highest prevalence of all eight comorbidity domains.MUSC IndependentMUSC / International survey

Research gap: The most prevalent comorbidity domain in hEDS has the thinnest research base. No large prospective dermatological study in a well-characterised hEDS population using 2017 criteria exists. Skin features are in the diagnostic criteria but systematically underweighted in clinical assessment and clinical research design. A dedicated dermatological phenotyping study in hEDS is needed.

The following companion resources are planned for development as extensions of this research landscape document. Each covers a specialist area in greater depth.

Focus areas: Mitral valve prolapse (in 2017 diagnostic criteria), PFO prevalence in hEDS, pectus deformities, aortic root dilation, mitral annular disjunction, atrial septal defects.

Key papers: Paige et al. Stanford (cardiac involvement in hEDS), Norris Lab KLK15 mouse model (MVP finding), Harvey et al. 2025 (Sox9 cardiac valve development).

Core gap: No published study has systematically assessed the full spectrum of cardiac and chest wall structural variants in a well-characterised hEDS population using current 2017 criteria. Cardiac features beyond MVP and aortic root dilation are underscreened and under-documented.

Focus areas: Cerebral folate deficiency, FRα autoantibodies in ASD and hEDS, transgenerational heritability, pregnancy complications, miscarriage, neural tube defects, MTHFR interaction.

Key papers: Frye et al. Mol Psychiatry 2013 (foundational FRα/ASD paper), Rossignol & Frye 2021 (systematic review), Quadros et al. 2025 (transgenerational heritability), Qin et al. Nutrients 2023 (pregnancy and miscarriage).

Core gap: The interaction between FRα autoantibodies, MTHFR variants, and SERPINA1 deficiency in multigenerational reproductive failure patterns has not been studied. The transgenerational transmission of FRα autoantibodies and its contribution to neurodevelopmental presentations across generations represents an emerging and clinically important research area.

Focus areas: ASD/ADHD diagnostic criteria bias toward male presentations, masking in females, late diagnosis patterns, the ConnectED v2.0 neurodivergence assessment methodology.

Key papers: Cederlöf et al. 2016, Csecs et al. 2022, Eccles et al. 2024, Glans et al. 2021.

Core gap: ASD and ADHD diagnostic tools have documented bias toward male presentations. In a condition that is 80%+ female, systematic misidentification of neurodivergence is likely and the true prevalence in hEDS populations is unknown. Assessment tools calibrated for female presentations are needed.

Focus areas: COVID-19 as trifecta trigger and unmasking agent, POTS in Long COVID, MCAS mechanism in Long COVID, hEDS as risk factor for Long COVID severity.

Key papers: Ganesh & Munipalli 2024, Torok et al. 2025, Seeley et al. 2025, LISTEN cohort 2024.

Core gap: No prospective study has examined the prevalence of undiagnosed hEDS/HSD in Long COVID populations or tested MCAS-directed treatment in Long COVID patients with trifecta features.

ConnectED Health Australia (www.connectedhealth.au) is a patient-scientist led organisation dedicated to accessible, evidence-based education and clinical tools for people living with hEDS, POTS, MCAS, and Long COVID.

The ConnectED Health Assessment App is a world-first health assessment tool designed to help patients understand and communicate their symptoms to healthcare providers. The assessment is weighted according to rigour of peer-reviewed clinical evidence and has been recognised for its bias-reduction methodology.

Founder:
Tracy Finnegan RN, BAppSci (Integrated Resource Management) | ICU Nurse 1991-2013 | IMB University of Queensland Directors Circle | Harvard Medical School AI in Healthcare (Top 4 of 600) | LEAN Patient Expert, Australian POTS Foundation | Lived experience: hEDS, POTS, MCAS, Long COVID.

This document is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional regarding your health circumstances. © Tracy Finnegan / ConnectED Health Australia 2026. All rights reserved.

Document version: April 2026. Next quarterly review: July 2026.